Hansen’s disease is an infectious and contagious, granulomatous and chronic disease caused by the Gram-positive, acid-fast bacillus Mycobacterium leprae. Patients can be classified according to the operational form of the disease, being those with up to 5 lesions considered paucibacillary, and those with more than 5 lesions, multibacillary.1-3 Bacilloscopy is a test that is part of the diagnostic armamentarium for Hansen’s disease. It is the microscopic analysis of lymph smear with Ziehl-Neelsen stain, in order to identify the bacilli. Patients with positive bacilloscopy are considered multibacillary, regardless of the number of lesions.4 Hansen’s disease patients can develop reactions, acute phenomena of immunologic and inflammatory changes in face ofM. leprae antigens. Type 1 reactions are due to late hypersensitivity with the activation of TH1 and TH17 pathways and occur in borderline patients. In general, they reflect an improvement of the defenses against M. leprae. Type 2 reactions are caused by the compensatory exacerbation of the humoral immunity via activation of the TH2 and TH17 pathways in the lepromatous pole of the disease.1-5 Reactions represent not very well known immunologic responses and reflect a peculiar clinical picture, therefore requiring the dermatologist’s attention.4 The objective of this study is to describe the relationship between bacilloscopy and the operational classification of Hansen’s disease in patients with reactions. It is an observational, cross-sectional study, where information in the files of patients with notified Hansen’s disease from a reference center in the municipality of Campinas (SP) from 2010 to 2015, with type 1 or type 2 reactions (n = 41) was analyzed. The variables analyzed were: bacilloscopy at diagnosis, operational classification and type of reaction. Statistical analysis was performed using simple frequencies. Ninety-one cases of Hansen’s disease were diagnosed and notified in the period studied. Of those, 41 cases (45%) had some type of reaction. Twenty-five (61%) patients had type 1 reaction, 11 (27%) patients had type 2 reactions and 5 (12%) patients had both types of reaction in different times of the course of the disease (Table 1). Among those with type 1 reaction, 18 (72%) cases had negative bacilloscopy at diagnosis (Graph 1A). Twenty-one (84%) cases had an operational classification of multibacillary and 4 (16%) cases, of paucibacillary (Graph 1B). Among those with type 2 reaction, all cases (100%) had positive bacilloscopy at the time of diagnosis and an operational classification of multibacillary. Of the patients who developed type 1 and type 2 reaction sometime during the course of Hansen’s disease, 100% (five cases) had positive bacilloscopy and were multibacillary. Firstly, we observed that the percentage of patients with positive bacilloscopy who developed a reaction (56%) was higher than the percentage of patients with negative bacilloscopy who developed a reaction (44%). Higher frequencies of type 1 reaction were identified among patients with negative bacilloscopy and type 2 reaction among individuals with positive bacilloscopy. However, most patients in both reaction groups had an operational classification of multibacillary. The predominance of negative bacilloscopy among those with type 1 reaction is against most published studies, for it is known that there is a positive relationship between the amount of bacilli and the appearance of a reaction and that the presence of high bacteriological indexes is a risk factor for the development of either reaction.2 This finding can be explained by the higher occurrence of a type 1 reaction among those with borderline Hansen’s disease, in whom there is a more effective cellular immune response and a lower bacillary load than in the lepromatous pole. Another possibility would be the occurrence of a type 1 reaction associated to a negative bacilloscopy in borderline tuberculoid patients, who are closer to the tuberculoid pole on the immunology and histopathology.1-3 Other possible causes for the result could be the insufficient collection of lymph or unavailability of the Faraco-Fite stain at the laboratory of the university service where the study was performed (this stain is more sensitive to identify the bacillus on histology from skin samples), thus interfering with the operational classification of the patients.6,7 The other findings are similar to other published studies.8,9 In the period studied, there was a higher prevalence of type 1 reaction, but this is not a reassuring finding: although being systemically less severe, this type of reaction generates more signs of physical disability, many times accompanied by neuritis, which is responsible for important injury and sequelae, affecting the patients’ quality of life.2,8 This picture is more frequent in those with type 1 reaction than those with type 2 reaction, even when both groups are multibacillary.2,8 For this reason, it is not accurate to think that patients with type 1 reactions and operational classification of multibacillary, but with negative bacilloscopy, have a better prognosis because they have a lower bacillary load.8,9 Considering that almost half the patients had a reaction, we can conclude that it is extremely important to identify and manage early those affected to avoid the appearance of severe sequelae. Operational and bacilloscopic characterization of Hansen’s disease patients positively contributes in the early diagnosis of reactions, because there is a higher chance of developing the reaction when the bacilloscopy is positive and the operational classification is multibacillary, supporting the importance of the results reported in this study.

Graph 1.

A. Bacilloscopy of those with reactions. B. Operational classification of those with reactions

(0.04MB).

Financial support: None.

Conflict of interest: None.